Update on University
of Montana’s women’s cross country team’s race on Friday October 4, 2019 which
has a male runner masquerading as a female runner. His name is now June
Eastwood.
The Grizzly cross country squads swept the team
titles at the Montana Invitational at the UM [University of Montana] Golf
Course on Friday afternoon, and June Eastwood [A male competing
as a female.] helped the Grizzlies claim the top five spots in the women’s
race with a first-place finish.
Eastwood had finished second to freshman Beatrix Frissell at Montana’s first two races this fall. On Friday they did what they’ve been doing all season [Third race this year.] -- running mostly side by side -- but this time Eastwood got to the tape first, by a mere tenth of a second.
She [He] and Frissell both had times of 17:55.
‘Coach talks about having synergy as a team, and I think that’s the case with me and Bea. We work really well together,’ said Eastwood. ‘We went in wanting to work together. We moved through the course really well and put a good race effort in.’
A late surge gave Montana the top-five spots in the women’s race, which, with no other Division I runners or teams [Montana State had a meet on Saturday and did not compete.], was not surprisingly dominated by Grizzlies.
Samantha Engebretsen (18:22) was third, Hannah Wylie fourth (18:29) and Rachel Torrey fifth (18:30) [Remember only the top five runners from each school score points.]. Emily Pittis (18:39) was top 10, Isabella Nellos (18:59) top 12 and Carly Dahms (19:29) top 20 [These three Montana runners competed but did not score any points since they competed as the 6th, 7th, and 8th runners for Montana.].”
Eastwood had finished second to freshman Beatrix Frissell at Montana’s first two races this fall. On Friday they did what they’ve been doing all season [Third race this year.] -- running mostly side by side -- but this time Eastwood got to the tape first, by a mere tenth of a second.
She [He] and Frissell both had times of 17:55.
‘Coach talks about having synergy as a team, and I think that’s the case with me and Bea. We work really well together,’ said Eastwood. ‘We went in wanting to work together. We moved through the course really well and put a good race effort in.’
A late surge gave Montana the top-five spots in the women’s race, which, with no other Division I runners or teams [Montana State had a meet on Saturday and did not compete.], was not surprisingly dominated by Grizzlies.
Samantha Engebretsen (18:22) was third, Hannah Wylie fourth (18:29) and Rachel Torrey fifth (18:30) [Remember only the top five runners from each school score points.]. Emily Pittis (18:39) was top 10, Isabella Nellos (18:59) top 12 and Carly Dahms (19:29) top 20 [These three Montana runners competed but did not score any points since they competed as the 6th, 7th, and 8th runners for Montana.].”
1st post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
2nd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
3rd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
4th post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
|||||||||||||
Video from Judicial Watch:
“Investigating the Investigators”
Judicial Watch is one conservative organization worth donating to and it is tax deductible as a charitable contribution if you file a Schedule A form.
“Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.”
“Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024”
|||||||||||||
Very early in the morning of November 20, 2018, I turned off my computer. Microsoft automatically downloaded a “critical update.” Two hours later when I tried to use the computer, I could not. I could not leave the startup page. I haven’t been on the computer since that morning. I am now using our local library’s computers and have not yet decided if I will try to have my computer repaired. However, it is time to start blogging again. Since I also can’t get into my old Microsoft accounts, I’m starting a new blog as of Saturday, May 4, 2019.
From my last post before being shut down:
“Even though I am being ‘shadow-banned,’ my pageview total hit an all time record high in October. Thank you.
According to google, October 18, 2018 was my 700th post on this website.
I’m still having major problems with microsoft. I finally ended up restoring it twice.”
|||||||||||||
Note: [ ] = my additions
|||||||||||||
My old pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2016/11/transsexual-fantasy-strikes-morton.html
“Transsexual Fantasy Strikes Morton, Illinois School District 709 and Four Board Members Capitulate to a Sexual Delusion.”
The new pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
“March for Our Lives, March for Life, Mainstream Media Hypocrisy, Leftist Hypocrisy, and Students as ‘Useful Idiots?’”
|||||||||||||
House of Representatives Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
These 24 Republicans voted to force taxpayers to pay for mutilating surgery for delusional transsexuals who are in the military. [I removed the names of the Representatives from all States who did not seek reelection since their primaries are over.]
Republicans voting No to defeat the amendment: [Original 24 now down to 8.]
[Conservative Review Conservative Scorecard grade]
No votes from Republicans by State:
1) Paul Cook [California-District 8 F 43% Won reelection.]
2) Jeffrey Denham [California-District 10 F 33% Lost.]
3) Steve Knight [California-District 25 F 31% Lost.]
1) Mike Coffman [Colorado-District 6 F 56% Lost.]
1) Carlos Curbelo [Florida-District 26 F 19% Lost.]
2) Brian Mast [Florida-District 18 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Justin Amash [Michigan-District 3 A 96% Won reelection. Has now left the Republican Party and is running in 2020 as an Independent candidate according to reports]
2) Jack Bergman [Michigan-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Leonard Lance [New Jersey-District 7 F 42% Lost.]
2) Tom MacArthur [New Jersey-District 3 F 25% Lost.]
1) John Faso [New York-District 19 F 50% Lost.]
2) John Katko [New York-District 24 F 25% Won reelection.]
3) Tom Reed [New York-District 23 F 43% Won reelection.]
4) Elise Stefanik [New York-21 F 19% Won reelection.]
5) Claudia Tenney [New York-District 22 F 38% Lost.]
1) Brian (Michael) Fitzpatrick [Pennsylvania-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Barbara Comstock [Virginia-District 10 F 19% Lost.]
These Republicans In Name Only by voting to affirm the delusional fantasies of transsexuals are helping to destroy the military and are, in my opinion, putting both delusional transsexuals and all other military personnel in danger on the battle field during combat. I will keep these names up at least through the 2020 primaries. Perhaps in 2020 more of these Representatives will be defeated in Republican primaries by actual Republican conservatives.
|||||||||||||
Update: Illinois Leftists “Wall of Shame.”
Original Article: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/08/transgendertranssexual-delusion.html
“Transgender/Transsexual Delusion, Legislative Fraud, and a RINO Governor Who Signed into Law His Reelection Defeat”
1) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
1a) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner: The last week of September, 2017 Governor Rauner also signed into law a bill requiring Illinois taxpayers to pay for the murder of babies within the womb for Illinois Medicaid recipients and State of Illinois employees. Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
Update: Because of the terrible choice for Governor at the top of the ticket, Illinois lost two more Republican members in the House of Representatives.
2) 64 members of the Illinois State House of Representatives [Listed at the end of the original article]
3) 32 members of the Illinois State Senate [Listed at the end of the original article]
|||||||||||||
Update: The Illinois House of Representatives overrode the Governor’s veto increasing the individual State income tax rate by 32%.
https://illinoisfamily.org/politics/unsustainable-raising-taxes-solves-nothing-makes-illinois-worse-off/
“The Illinois State House was back in session this afternoon to override Governor Bruce Rauner’s veto of a 32 percent permanent tax hike on Illinois families (SB 9). This tax grab also raises the corporate income tax rate by 33 percent. As anticipated, the House voted to override the veto this afternoon by a vote of 71-42 [71 being the minimum number of votes to override.]—with 61 Democrats and 10 Republicans voting in favor of increasing our taxes [By raising the tax rate by 32%. Plus, no doubt, increasing the cost of goods and/or increasing unemployment by raising corporate income tax rates by 33 1/3rd percent.].
To see how your state representative voted, please click HERE. To see how your state senator voted, please click HERE.
Much has been written for many years now about how Illinois is being mismanaged. The votes to override common sense is only the latest chapter in that mismanagement.”
Illinois Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
From: David E. Smith of Illinois Family Action [Updated with the 2018 election results]
July 7, 2017
“The Republicans who voted for the tax grab and who were reelected in 2018:
02) Terri Bryant (Carbondale) Won. [115th District]
04) Norine Hammond (Macomb) Won. [93rd District]
10) Mike Unes (East Peoria) Won. [61st District]”
Do you think the decision to vote to override the veto for a deficit budget that raised the income tax by 32% was popular in these districts? Seven of the 10 did not run for reelection.
|||||||||||||
Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. The “Four Pretenders” are:
Shaun Bill elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Clint Heinold elected term
ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Kelly Scarfe elected term
ended in 2017. She is off the school board.
Michelle Bernier elected
term ended in 2019. She did not run for reelection. She is off the school
board.
Board decisions have consequences. Elections have consequences.
|||||||||||||
Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 46 years ago as of January 22, 2019
46 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. EVIL personified!
Eight months after the 46th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, 747,945 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the AMERICAN HOLOCAUST continues day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Congress can not even defund Planned Murderhood. Establishment Republicans continually CAPITULATE to the Leftist socialist MURDERERS.
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
|||||||||||||
I created a “Wall of Shame” a few years ago for really horrendous Legislative votes and Governor’s actions. It is time for a “Hall of Honor” for actions above and beyond the call of duty. The first such “Hall of Honor” goes to the Mayor and Trustees of the Village of Morton, Illinois who prohibited marijuana businesses within the village limits the same day that the law went into force. The mayor proposed the ordinance and the Trustees passed the ordinance 6-0. The “Hall of Honor” not includes the El Paso Mayor and Council and 6 members of the Naperville City Council.
“Hall of Honor”
Morton
Mayor (President) Jeff Kaufman
Trustee Rod Blunier
Trustee Steve Leitch
Trustee Clinton Leman
Trustee Brad Menold
Trustee Ken Newman
Trustee Nate Parrott
El Paso
Mayor J.W. Price
City Council Member Will Moore
City Council Member Jennie
Kearney
City Council Member Alex
Brucker
City Council Member Mary Ellen
Kilpatrick
City Council Member Ken Faulk
City Council Member Kevin
Wheatley
Naperville
There was some questionable information about this vote in the
article that I used. Two members of the Naperville City Council contacted me
about it. I asked one of the two to send me the actual motion as voted upon. I
received it Saturday when the library was closed. That motion stated:
“A motion in substitution [A motion replacing the previous motion. The previous motion was not voted upon and I am not providing it here.] was made by Councilman Coyne, seconded by Councilman Hinterlong, for Option 1: to pass the ordinance amending Title 3 of the Naperville Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 17 prohibiting adult use cannabis business establishments other than medical cannabis cultivation centers and medical cannabis dispensing organizations and to direct staff to bring back a report within 60 days that advises Council concerning including an advisory (non-binding) referendum question on a future election ballot.”
Also from the council member who furnished the motion: “ … the three who voted against made it clear that they were only voting against because they wanted the motion to include more specific details regarding what specific [future election] ballot the referendum will be on:”
I apologize for the confusion. Newspaper articles generally don’t give the specific motion for a vote or the reasons why the members are voting for or against the specific motion.
These six council members voted to
prohibit ALL marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction:
Council member Kevin Coyne ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Patricia Gustin ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Paul Hinterlong ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Patrick Kelly ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member John Krummen ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Dr. Benjamin White ~
current term expires in 2021
These three members of the council
voted against the motion as presented:
Mayor Steve Chirico ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Theresa Sullivan ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Judith Brodhead ~ current term expires in 2021
||||||||||||
1st post about murdering babies within the womb:
2nd post about murdering babies within the womb:
3rd post about murdering babies within the womb:
4th post about murdering babies within the womb:
5th post about murdering babies within the womb:
6th post about murdering babies within the womb:
7th post about murdering babies within the womb:
8th post about murdering babies within the womb:
9th post about murdering babies within the womb:
10th post about murdering babies within the womb:
11th post about murdering babies within the womb:
12th post about murdering babies within the womb:
13th post about murdering babies within the womb:
14th post about murdering babies within the womb:
15th post about murdering babies within the womb:
16th post about murdering babies within the womb:
17th post about murdering babies within the womb:
18th post about murdering babies within the womb:
19th post about murdering babies within the womb:
To save the life of the mother is a false premise. See:
“If a pregnant woman’s life is in danger, is abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] justified?”
|||||||||||||
New post:
Criminal law basically serves two purposes: It defines certain
behaviors as either right or wrong according to the governing society. It also
provides the necessary punishment for those who violate those standards
established by the governing society. In general, the more severe the
punishment(s) the more abhorrent the negative behavior is considered to
be.
We also know, from past experiences and human behavior, people will basically react to any law in one of four ways. Depending upon the behavior, the degree of each of these four ways will vary. However, in general, almost all people can be placed in one of the four ways in relation to a specific action.
1) Some people would never participate in a specific action regardless of the law because that action is morally reprehensible to them. For example: Murder. Even if murder were “legal” within the society, they would refuse to commit a murder.
2) Some people might, under the “correct” circumstances, participate in an action if legal but they will not participate in that same practice if illegal because of the societal declaration that it is unacceptable, because of the punishment imposed, or for both reasons. In this circumstance, light to no punishment might be inducement enough to participate in the action when a more severe punishment would greatly decrease participation.
3) Some people will be involved in an illegal action if they believe they have a chance to escape being caught and/or being punished for the illegal activity. In general, the less likely being caught and/or punished, the more likely they will participate in that illegal action [This is particularly important for minors if the activity is legal for adults but illegal for minors. Alcohol consumption and smoking cigarettes are two current examples. Use of “recreational” marijuana will be added to this list when “recreational” marijuana is officially legal on January 1, 2020. There is no question based upon past experience and human behavior that use will increase with availability, lack of enforcement, and peer pressure, among other factors.]
4) Some people are going to commit the crime regardless, if they decide it is in their best interest to commit the crime and they have no moral compunction not to commit the action. This is why no law will ever completely prevent that activity. Laws against murders don’t stop murders. Severe punishment doesn’t prevent all murders. No law ever stops an illegal act 100% of the time.
For legalizing “recreational” marijuana as well as changes in most laws, the individuals who fall into categories 2 and 3 are the ones who will generally be most affected by the change in the law.
Friday’s post conclusion:
If “recreational” marijuana businesses are approved in a local
jurisdiction, that jurisdiction will
experience an increase in the use and abuse of marijuana by minors. It occurs now with alcohol which is illegal for minors and it
will increase for marijuana although still illegal for minors. Legalizing
“recreational” marijuana tells minors that the State of Illinois and the local
jurisdiction see nothing wrong with using marijuana. Minors will have greater
access to marijuana just as they now have access to alcohol. This law will NOT protect minors. It will put minors at much
greater risk than they currently are.
It is naïve to believe otherwise.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of a “recreational” drug
“A drug (such as cocaine, marijuana, or methamphetamine) used without medical justification for its psychoactive effects often in the belief that occasional use of such a substance is not habit-forming or addictive
What is the definition of occasional use?
I was an elected official of a school board in Arizona. Believe me
when I say that good elected public officials pay attention to these ACTIONS.
If they don’t and they go against what you want the solution is simple and
democratic. VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE.
In Morton a few years ago, four of our seven school board members voted to implement a “transsexual” policy contrary to the wishes of the general voting public. The next election, three of the four were up for reelection. ALL three of them decided not to run for reelection. Our school superintendent who supported the four took another superintendent job as did the high school principal. I don’t know if the high school principal supported it but my guess is that it was a factor in her leaving. In the next election for the fourth member, she also decided not to run for reelection.
Remember this: Decisions have consequences and as the voting
public you have a voice in those consequences. You have the ultimate power over elected officials’ decisions, if you use it.
“Illinois Marijuana
Dispensary License Applications Unveiled
State agencies also released a map of parts of the
state determined to be ‘disproportionately impacted’ by poverty and the drug
war [As legislated by the Leftist socialists in the General Assembly].
By Jonah Meadows, Patch Staff
| October 2, 2019
The
Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation [IDFPR]
released applications for the first 75 cannabis dispensary licenses open to
organizations that do not already have medical cannabis permits.
Springfield,
Illinois — State regulators on Tuesday released the first applications for
licenses to sell recreational marijuana in Illinois that are open to
organizations that do not already operate medical cannabis dispensaries.
Applications
are due between December 10 and January 2, and the Illinois Department of
Financial and Professional Regulation will award the ‘conditional adult use [Dreaming.
It is going to be adult and minor use.] dispensing organization licenses by May
1, 2020.
The
latest round of licenses will be the first to be issued based on a points-based
scoring system [Mandated by the Leftist socialist General Assembly to “create”
equality.]. Applicants will be evaluated on a 250-point scale consisting
of 10 factors — labor, diversity [What?] and environmental plans,
security, business plans, experience [Experience based upon illegal activities
in the past?], employee training, the owners’ status as a veteran, an Illinois
resident or a social equity applicant [What in the world is a “social equity”
applicant?].
The
IDFPR will rank them against each other to determine who gets the first 75
licenses. In case of a tie, the applicant with the best community engagement
plan [Community engagement plan is an eleventh segment of the scoring system
that is only considered if there is a tie?] will get the license.
‘As
Illinois enters the next phase of its adult use cannabis program, we are
committed to a process that is efficient, timely and most critically, continues
to place equity at the forefront [Really? And you actually think this scoring
system will achieve this goal? What kind of a NEW bureaucracy will be needed to
check and verify these applications? As if the State does not have enough
budget problems currently.],’ said Governor JB Pritzker in a release. ‘From
ensuring social equity applicants receive points on their application [Social
equity?] to providing grants and technical assistance [More costs for the
State.], this is a process that does more than any other state in the nation to
make equity a priority [Leftist socialists attempting to legislate “equality”
as determined by the Leftist socialists controlled General Assembly. This
should really go well coming from a legislative body that has not fulfilled its
constitutional responsibility to balance the Illinois yearly budget since, at
least, 2004 when I moved back to Morton the first time. Now though, the
legislature is “competent” to legislate “equality.” Good luck with this.].’
Under
the marijuana legalization law Pritzker signed in June, the Cannabis Regulation
and Tax Act established medical cannabis dispensaries get a head start. They
are assumed to be in compliance with the law [And of course they are?] and not subjected
to the scoring system by regulators.
Owners of each of the 55 medical dispensaries in place has [Sic.]
the opportunity to apply for ‘same-site’ and ‘second-site’ licenses, which
would allow for the sale of cannabis products to anyone aged 21 or over [And
more bureaucracy to “insure” that minors are not buying marijuana products.
This is going to be fiasco. This is certainly NOT a KISS [Keep It Simple
Sxxxxx] law. This reminds me of the Obamacare fiasco.].
‘We’re committed to ensuring that this process is transparent,
fair and accessible to people from all communities in Illinois [Right.],’ the
release quoted IDFPR Secretary Deborah Hagan as saying. ‘Our Department
understands the important role it plays in ensuring all applicants have an
opportunity to become involved in this industry [Drug dealing is now a “legitimate”
industry? Just like murdering babies within the womb is a “legitimate”
industry.], and we will continue to work with our partner agencies to ensure
applicants have the information they need [More bureaucracy. How much money was
budgeted for these NEW bureaucratic activities?].’
The application
released Oct. 1 requires aspiring cannabis
businesses to submit records of ownership and management structure, plans for
training, education, environment, businesses, security, operation, recall,
record-keeping, community engagement and diversity [Seriously? The application
is going to scare off a LOT of potential “equity” applicants?]. They must also
submit a floor plan, although no extra points will be given to applicants that
have already secured a location.
With three months to go before marijuana becomes legal to possess
and consume in Illinois, the IDFPR has issued
only five licenses for retail cannabis
operations to be open January 1 [Five out of a possible 55. There seems to be
no rush to expand.].
All
are ‘same-site’ licenses at existing medical dispensaries. All are operated by
the same firm. But at least one of them will not be able to open. The
Naperville City Council voted 6-3 to block any
adult use cannabis businesses from opening in town, which prohibits Green Thumb
Industries’ 3C Compassionate [Right? A misnomer of a name.] Care Center from
taking advantage of the state license.
The
next 75 licenses will be divided up by Bureau of Labor Statistics Regions. The
only other location restriction included in the law: they must be at least
1,500 feet from another licensed dispensary [.284 miles.]. It is up to local
governments whether to impose additional limitations, like buffer zones from
residential areas, parks or schools [Let’s put them all next to schools. What a
great idea.].
[The
State’s division is given at the website. Eight counties including Cook County
which includes Chicago are given 47 licenses. The seven counties excluding Cook
County surround Cook County from the north, to the west, and to the south. Five
counties to the north, to the east, and to the south of Peoria County,
including Morton’s Tazewell County, have 3 licenses. Peoria County is one of
the five counties. See the website for the full distribution. This is going to
be interesting. https://patch.com/illinois/stcharles-il/s/gv2vt/illinois-marijuana-dispensary-license-applications-unveiled?utm_term=article-slot-5&utm_source=newsletter-daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
]
On Monday, the Pritzker administration released a map showing the
areas determined to be ‘Disproportionately Impacted
Areas,’ those hardest hit by decades of cannabis prohibition [In
other words, those areas that had the greatest criminal activity?]. (See a map of
qualifying areas.)
The Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity found 683
census tracts with a population of more than 2 million qualified under criteria
laid out in the legalization law. Such areas have high rates of cannabis arrests [high
levels of criminal activity.], as well as above-average unemployment, poverty
or food stamp use [Why do these areas exist? Because of Leftist socialist
policies?].
To qualify as social equity applicants, organizations must have a
majority owner who has lived in such an area for at least five of the last 10
years, has been arrested for a minor cannabis-related offense [Define minor.
Before or AFTER the charges were plea bargained down?] or is a ‘member of an
impacted family.’ If applicants have 10 or more employees, at least half of
them must either have been charged with a cannabis offense or live in one of
the impacted areas [Seriously? This is social engineering Leftist socialist
style.].
In addition to an extra 50 points on the 250-point scale, social
equity applicants will get a discount on application fees [Equal justice under
the law?]. The non-refundable application fee for non-social equity applicants
is $5,000 [Seriously?]. If IDFPR awards them a license, the fee is $60,000 for
the first two years. Social equity applicants pay only $2,500 up front and
$30,000 if awarded the license [This is fairness?].
The state commerce department is also due to launch a program to
provide low-interest loans to qualified social equity applicants [More
fairness.], but it has not yet begun.
Last week, Pritzker announced state Senator Toi Hutchinson, an
Olympia Fields Democrat [Leftist socialist] and one of the co-sponsors of the
legalization law, had resigned her seat to join his administration as ‘cannabis
regulation oversight officer [See: https://votevance2020.blogspot.com/2019/09/recreational-marijuana-legalized-in_30.html.’ ]
Hutchinson will oversee the
implementation of the law she co-wrote by five state agencies — IDFPR,
commerce, agriculture, public health and revenue, Capital Fax reported. She
will also have input on the Illinois State Police’s cannabis policies [Writing
law?]. The former 40th District state senator told the Chicago Sun-Times the
goal of the legalization bill was to reduce
barriers for people entering the cannabis industry [Give favoritism to criminals.].
‘It’s going to be fascinating to see where the applications come
from, how strong the applications are, and we’re going to have an eye towards
making sure the intentions and the spirit of the law are carried out [It sure
is. However, it is NOT going to be achieved. Legislating “equality” is a quagmire
if ever there was one.]’,’ Hutchinson said.”
This
is going to be even more of a disaster than I originally thought it would be.
There are only three things that can occur once “recreational” marijuana is legalized. Its use will increase among
minors. Its use will decrease among minors. Its use will remain the same. Realistically, which
of the three do you believe will be the case?
|||||||||||
Petitions:
Petition to American Medical Association to Stop Trying to Prevent Pro-Life Laws from Going into Effect
|||||||||||||
Contribute to super PAC for Black conservative Senate candidate John James in Michigan: https://votevance2020.blogspot.com/2019/07/senate-conservatives-action-senate.html
|||||||||||||
“From the moment of conception until natural death, we must advocate for the right to life in this nation [Which is the FIRST right listed in the Declaration of Independence. Without the right to life, all other rights are irrelevant.], the last, best hope of mankind.”
Roe vs. Wade has NEVER been the law of the land. It has been and is government sanctioned murder. It is NOT and never has been law. For over 46 years we have been murdering our own children based upon lies and deceit.
For Life, for Liberty
Don L. Vance
“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment
No comments:
Post a Comment