1st post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
2nd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
3rd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
4th post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
|||||||||||||
Video from Judicial Watch:
“Investigating the Investigators”
Judicial Watch is one conservative organization worth donating to and it is tax deductible as a charitable contribution if you file a Schedule A form.
“Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.”
“Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024”
|||||||||||||
Very early in the morning of November 20, 2018, I turned off my computer. Microsoft automatically downloaded a “critical update.” Two hours later when I tried to use the computer, I could not. I could not leave the startup page. I haven’t been on the computer since that morning. I am now using our local library’s computers and have not yet decided if I will try to have my computer repaired. However, it is time to start blogging again. Since I also can’t get into my old Microsoft accounts, I’m starting a new blog as of Saturday, May 4, 2019.
From my last post before being shut down:
“Even though I am being ‘shadow-banned,’ my pageview total hit an all time record high in October. Thank you.
According to google, October 18, 2018 was my 700th post on this website.
I’m still having major problems with microsoft. I finally ended up restoring it twice.”
|||||||||||||
Note: [ ] = my additions
|||||||||||||
My old pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2016/11/transsexual-fantasy-strikes-morton.html
“Transsexual Fantasy Strikes Morton, Illinois School District 709 and Four Board Members Capitulate to a Sexual Delusion.”
The new pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
“March for Our Lives, March for Life, Mainstream Media Hypocrisy, Leftist Hypocrisy, and Students as ‘Useful Idiots?’”
|||||||||||||
House of Representatives Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
These 24 Republicans voted to force taxpayers to pay for mutilating surgery for delusional transsexuals who are in the military. [I removed the names of the Representatives from all States who did not seek reelection since their primaries are over.]
Republicans voting No to defeat the amendment: [Original 24 now down to 8.]
[Conservative Review Conservative Scorecard grade]
No votes from Republicans by State:
1) Paul Cook [California-District 8 F 43% Won reelection.]
2) Jeffrey Denham [California-District 10 F 33% Lost.]
3) Steve Knight [California-District 25 F 31% Lost.]
1) Mike Coffman [Colorado-District 6 F 56% Lost.]
1) Carlos Curbelo [Florida-District 26 F 19% Lost.]
2) Brian Mast [Florida-District 18 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Justin Amash [Michigan-District 3 A 96% Won reelection. Has now left the Republican Party and is running in 2020 as an Independent candidate according to reports]
2) Jack Bergman [Michigan-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Leonard Lance [New Jersey-District 7 F 42% Lost.]
2) Tom MacArthur [New Jersey-District 3 F 25% Lost.]
1) John Faso [New York-District 19 F 50% Lost.]
2) John Katko [New York-District 24 F 25% Won reelection.]
3) Tom Reed [New York-District 23 F 43% Won reelection.]
4) Elise Stefanik [New York-21 F 19% Won reelection.]
5) Claudia Tenney [New York-District 22 F 38% Lost.]
1) Brian (Michael) Fitzpatrick [Pennsylvania-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Barbara Comstock [Virginia-District 10 F 19% Lost.]
These Republicans In Name Only by voting to affirm the delusional fantasies of transsexuals are helping to destroy the military and are, in my opinion, putting both delusional transsexuals and all other military personnel in danger on the battle field during combat. I will keep these names up at least through the 2020 primaries. Perhaps in 2020 more of these Representatives will be defeated in Republican primaries by actual Republican conservatives.
|||||||||||||
Update: Illinois Leftists “Wall of Shame.”
Original Article: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/08/transgendertranssexual-delusion.html
“Transgender/Transsexual Delusion, Legislative Fraud, and a RINO Governor Who Signed into Law His Reelection Defeat”
1) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
1a) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner: The last week of September, 2017 Governor Rauner also signed into law a bill requiring Illinois taxpayers to pay for the murder of babies within the womb for Illinois Medicaid recipients and State of Illinois employees. Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
Update: Because of the terrible choice for Governor at the top of the ticket, Illinois lost two more Republican members in the House of Representatives.
2) 64 members of the Illinois State House of Representatives [Listed at the end of the original article]
3) 32 members of the Illinois State Senate [Listed at the end of the original article]
|||||||||||||
Update: The Illinois House of Representatives overrode the Governor’s veto increasing the individual State income tax rate by 32%.
https://illinoisfamily.org/politics/unsustainable-raising-taxes-solves-nothing-makes-illinois-worse-off/
“The Illinois State House was back in session this afternoon to override Governor Bruce Rauner’s veto of a 32 percent permanent tax hike on Illinois families (SB 9). This tax grab also raises the corporate income tax rate by 33 percent. As anticipated, the House voted to override the veto this afternoon by a vote of 71-42 [71 being the minimum number of votes to override.]—with 61 Democrats and 10 Republicans voting in favor of increasing our taxes [By raising the tax rate by 32%. Plus, no doubt, increasing the cost of goods and/or increasing unemployment by raising corporate income tax rates by 33 1/3rd percent.].
To see how your state representative voted, please click HERE. To see how your state senator voted, please click HERE.
Much has been written for many years now about how Illinois is being mismanaged. The votes to override common sense is only the latest chapter in that mismanagement.”
Illinois Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
From: David E. Smith of Illinois Family Action [Updated with the 2018 election results]
July 7, 2017
“The Republicans who voted for the tax grab and who were reelected in 2018:
02) Terri Bryant (Carbondale) Won. [115th District]
04) Norine Hammond (Macomb) Won. [93rd District]
10) Mike Unes (East Peoria) Won. [61st District]”
Do you think the decision to vote to override the veto for a deficit budget that raised the income tax by 32% was popular in these districts? Seven of the 10 did not run for reelection.
|||||||||||||
Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. The “Four Pretenders” are:
Shaun Bill elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Clint Heinold elected term
ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Kelly Scarfe elected term
ended in 2017. She is off the school board.
Michelle Bernier elected
term ended in 2019. She did not run for reelection. She is off the school
board.
Board decisions have consequences. Elections have consequences.
|||||||||||||
Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 46 years ago as of January 22, 2019
46 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. EVIL personified!
Eight months after the 46th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, 747,945 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the AMERICAN HOLOCAUST continues day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Congress can not even defund Planned Murderhood. Establishment Republicans continually CAPITULATE to the Leftist socialist MURDERERS.
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
|||||||||||||
I created a “Wall of Shame” a few years ago for really horrendous Legislative votes and Governor’s actions. It is time for a “Hall of Honor” for actions above and beyond the call of duty. The first such “Hall of Honor” goes to the Mayor and Trustees of the Village of Morton, Illinois who prohibited marijuana businesses within the village limits the same day that the law went into force. The mayor proposed the ordinance and the Trustees passed the ordinance 6-0. The “Hall of Honor” not includes the El Paso Mayor and Council and 6 members of the Naperville City Council.
“Hall of Honor”
Morton
Mayor (President) Jeff Kaufman
Trustee Rod Blunier
Trustee Steve Leitch
Trustee Clinton Leman
Trustee Brad Menold
Trustee Ken Newman
Trustee Nate Parrott
El Paso
Mayor J.W. Price
City Council Member Will Moore
City Council Member Jennie
Kearney
City Council Member Alex
Brucker
City Council Member Mary Ellen
Kilpatrick
City Council Member Ken Faulk
City Council Member Kevin
Wheatley
Naperville
There was some questionable information about this vote in the
article that I used. Two members of the Naperville City Council contacted me
about it. I asked one of the two to send me the actual motion as voted upon. I
received it Saturday when the library was closed. That motion stated:
“A motion in substitution [A motion replacing the previous motion. The previous motion was not voted upon and I am not providing it here.] was made by Councilman Coyne, seconded by Councilman Hinterlong, for Option 1: to pass the ordinance amending Title 3 of the Naperville Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 17 prohibiting adult use cannabis business establishments other than medical cannabis cultivation centers and medical cannabis dispensing organizations and to direct staff to bring back a report within 60 days that advises Council concerning including an advisory (non-binding) referendum question on a future election ballot.”
Also from the council member who furnished the motion: “ … the three who voted against made it clear that they were only voting against because they wanted the motion to include more specific details regarding what specific [future election] ballot the referendum will be on:”
I apologize for the confusion. Newspaper articles generally don’t give the specific motion for a vote or the reasons why the members are voting for or against the specific motion.
These six council members voted to
prohibit ALL marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction:
Council member Kevin Coyne ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Patricia Gustin ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Paul Hinterlong ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Patrick Kelly ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member John Krummen ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Dr. Benjamin White ~
current term expires in 2021
These three members of the council
voted against the motion as presented:
Mayor Steve Chirico ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Theresa Sullivan ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Judith Brodhead ~ current term expires in 2021
||||||||||||
1st post about murdering babies within the womb:
2nd post about murdering babies within the womb:
3rd post about murdering babies within the womb:
4th post about murdering babies within the womb:
5th post about murdering babies within the womb:
6th post about murdering babies within the womb:
7th post about murdering babies within the womb:
8th post about murdering babies within the womb:
9th post about murdering babies within the womb:
10th post about murdering babies within the womb:
11th post about murdering babies within the womb:
12th post about murdering babies within the womb:
13th post about murdering babies within the womb:
14th post about murdering babies within the womb:
15th post about murdering babies within the womb:
16th post about murdering babies within the womb:
17th post about murdering babies within the womb:
18th post about murdering babies within the womb:
19th post about murdering babies within the womb:
To save the life of the mother is a false premise. See:
“If a pregnant woman’s life is in danger, is abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] justified?”
|||||||||||||
New post:
Criminal law basically serves two purposes: It defines certain
behaviors as either right or wrong according to the governing society. It also
provides the necessary punishment for those who violate those standards
established by the governing society. In general, the more severe the
punishment(s) the more abhorrent the negative behavior is considered to
be.
We also know, from past experiences and human behavior, people will basically react to any law in one of four ways. Depending upon the behavior, the degree of each of these four ways will vary. However, in general, almost all people can be placed in one of the four ways in relation to a specific action.
1) Some people would never participate in a specific action regardless of the law because that action is morally reprehensible to them. For example: Murder. Even if murder were “legal” within the society, they would refuse to commit a murder.
2) Some people might, under the “correct” circumstances, participate in an action if legal but they will not participate in that same practice if illegal because of the societal declaration that it is unacceptable, because of the punishment imposed, or for both reasons. In this circumstance, light to no punishment might be inducement enough to participate in the action when a more severe punishment would greatly decrease participation.
3) Some people will be involved in an illegal action if they believe they have a chance to escape being caught and/or being punished for the illegal activity. In general, the less likely being caught and/or punished, the more likely they will participate in that illegal action [This is particularly important for minors if the activity is legal for adults but illegal for minors. Alcohol consumption and smoking cigarettes are two current examples. Use of “recreational” marijuana will be added to this list when “recreational” marijuana is officially legal on January 1, 2020. There is no question based upon past experience and human behavior that use will increase with availability, lack of enforcement, and peer pressure, among other factors.]
4) Some people are going to commit the crime regardless, if they decide it is in their best interest to commit the crime and they have no moral compunction not to commit the action. This is why no law will ever completely prevent that activity. Laws against murders don’t stop murders. Severe punishment doesn’t prevent all murders. No law ever stops an illegal act 100% of the time.
For legalizing “recreational” marijuana as well as changes in most laws, the individuals who fall into categories 2 and 3 are the ones who will generally be most affected by the change in the law.
Friday’s post conclusion:
If “recreational” marijuana businesses are approved in a local
jurisdiction, that jurisdiction will
experience an increase in the use and abuse of marijuana by minors. It occurs now with alcohol which is illegal for minors and it
will increase for marijuana although still illegal for minors. Legalizing
“recreational” marijuana tells minors that the State of Illinois and the local
jurisdiction see nothing wrong with using marijuana. Minors will have greater
access to marijuana just as they now have access to alcohol. This law will NOT protect minors. It will put minors at much
greater risk than they currently are.
It is naïve to believe otherwise.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of a “recreational” drug
“A drug (such as cocaine, marijuana, or methamphetamine) used without medical justification for its psychoactive effects often in the belief that occasional use of such a substance is not habit-forming or addictive
What is the definition of occasional use?
I was an elected official of a school board in Arizona. Believe me
when I say that good elected public officials pay attention to these ACTIONS.
If they don’t and they go against what you want the solution is simple and
democratic. VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE.
In Morton a few years ago, four of our seven school board members voted to implement a “transsexual” policy contrary to the wishes of the general voting public. The next election, three of the four were up for reelection. ALL three of them decided not to run for reelection. Our school superintendent who supported the four took another superintendent job as did the high school principal. I don’t know if the high school principal supported it but my guess is that it was a factor in her leaving. In the next election for the fourth member, she also decided not to run for reelection.
Remember this: Decisions have consequences and as the voting
public you have a voice in those consequences. You have the ultimate power over elected officials’ decisions, if you use it.
“Governor
J. B. Pritzker taps state senator Toi Hutchinson to oversee pot rollout
Dan
Petrella and Jamie Munks | Chicago Tribune | September 27, 2019
Governor J.B. Pritzker has tapped one of the chief legislative
sponsors of Illinois’ recreational marijuana law to oversee the rollout of the
new program [Convenient isn’t it.].
State Senator Toi Hutchinson, a Democrat from south suburban
Olympia Fields, will resign her seat to join the Pritzker administration in the
$220,000-per-year role of cannabis regulation oversight officer [The governor
“only” made $177,412 per year in 2018 according to https://www.businessinsider.com/governor-salary-by-state-2018-1#illinois-13 .].
Hutchinson, whose current legislative salary of $80,037.84 includes a stipend
of $10,573.92 for chairing the Senate Revenue Committee [An increase in
salary of approximately 275%. Not bad for
being a major sponsor for controversial legislation.], will coordinate efforts
among the half-dozen state agencies that have a hand in regulating the
recreational marijuana industry that is preparing for a January 1 launch [Good
luck with such regulation. Imagine successful regulation in Illinois?].
‘She has thoroughly impressed me with her drive, insight and
ability to get big things done,’ Pritzker said in a statement. ‘I couldn’t be
more proud that she has agreed to join my administration and bring her
leadership to our effort at keeping equity at the forefront of the state’s new
adult-use cannabis industry [Is this a joke? “Adult-use?” Is he serious?].’
Hutchinson, who was first appointed to the Senate in 2009, was a
major proponent of the bill’s social equity goals [What does that even mean?
Similar to “social justice?”], including provisions that allow people to have
low-level marijuana convictions expunged [State convictions? States can not
expunge federal convictions. What are low-level marijuana convictions?] and
measures designed to help minority-owned businesses enter the industry [Industry?
Similar to the murder of babies within the womb industry?].
She is still coordinating her official resignation from the
Senate, and her start date with the Pritzker administration has not been
determined.
Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat, congratulated
Hutchinson on the new role but said her decision to leave the legislature is ‘a
profound loss for the Illinois Senate [In his opinion.].’
‘Senator Hutchinson has tackled some of the toughest issues facing
our state [Such as forcing Illinois taxpayers to pay for the murder babies
within the womb?], always performing with grace, eloquence and determination,’
Cullerton said in a statement.
Moving into the new job, Hutchinson has the rare opportunity to
oversee the implementation of a major piece of legislation that she played a
key role in drafting as a legislator [Conflict of interest?].
Part of that job will involve balancing the needs of the existing
medical marijuana companies, which the law gives a head start on entering the
recreational sales market, with the state’s goal of creating a more diverse
industry [What does that mean?] than the one that currently exists in Illinois
and in the 10 other states that have legalized pot, she said.
‘We’re going to have to figure out how to manage that tension
[Given Illinois’ outstating record, I’m confident that will occur. Not.],’
Hutchinson said Friday. ‘As I move into my new role, the job will be to make
sure that all those points are coordinated and that we’re hitting the
benchmarks that we need to so that this bill is implemented in the strongest
way and in the way we intended when we drafted it in the first place [Joke?].’
As a lawmaker,
Hutchinson has received $10,000 in campaign contributions from the marijuana
industry in the past year [What a surprise. Not.], according to state campaign
finance records show [Sic]. That includes a $5,000 contribution in October [Of
last year?] from a cultivator called Progressive Treatment Solutions, which
records show has close ties to an industry group now known as the Cannabis
Business Association of Illinois, and $5,000 on September 11 [Of this year?] from
Ghost Management, a California-based venture capital firm that invests in the
marijuana industry.
Hutchinson will give
back the political donations connected to the medical cannabis industry [How
kind of her?], Pritzker spokeswoman Jordan Abudayyeh.
State lawmakers voted
with much fanfare in May to legalize the sale of recreational marijuana, but
some of the administration’s early steps to implement the program have raised
concerns among industry players [What’s new?].
So far, the state has
awarded five licenses to existing medical dispensaries to sell recreational pot
beginning New Year’s Day. But one of those dispensaries won’t be able to use
its license because Naperville, where the shop is located, has banned
recreational sales [Naperville is in my “Hall of Honor” because of this vote.].
The Pritzker
administration has said medical dispensaries can’t sell to recreational
customers if they relocate, essentially rendering the Naperville license
useless unless the city changes its position. Medical dispensaries are
permitted to apply for a license for a secondary retail location.
Hutchinson is stepping
into the job of overseeing the state’s marijuana industry as policymakers across
the country are grappling with the outbreak of mysterious lung illness
associated with vaping. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[CDC] reported Thursday that 805 people have been sickened in 46 state[s] [Sic]
and 12 people have died. In Illinois, meanwhile, the Department of Public
Health has reported 88 cases, including one death, and 17 needing further
investigation.
The CDC on Thursday said
the latest findings in its investigation show that products containing THC —
the psychoactive compound in marijuana — play a role in the outbreak.
As Illinois prepares to
allow the widespread sale of marijuana vaping products, ‘this is absolutely an
issue of grave concern [You think?],’ Hutchinson said.
‘Anytime you look at
something that’s happened this suddenly and this unexpectedly and where people
can’t pin down what the source is, we have to be involved, we have to be at the
forefront, we have to make sure public health is the No. 1 priority [Then WHY
did the State legalize “recreational” marijuana? It sure wasn’t because of a
concern for public health.],’ she said.
Part of the problem,
Hutchinson said, is that the marijuana industry is still ‘in a gray area [Illegal
area.]’ where illicit products are competing with regulated products sold in
states that have legalized the drug [And will CONTINUE TO DO SO IN THE FUTURE.
If anyone believes legalizing “recreational” marijuana will end illegal sales
of marijuana, they are living in a fantasy world.].
The state will need to
examine its regulations for vaping products that contain THC as public health
officials learn more about the lung illness, she said.”
There are only three things that can occur once “recreational” marijuana is legalized. Its use will increase among
minors. Its use will decrease among minors. Its use will remain the same. Realistically, which
of the three do you believe will be the case?
|||||||||||
Petitions:
Petition to American Medical Association to Stop Trying to Prevent Pro-Life Laws from Going into Effect
|||||||||||||
Contribute to super PAC for Black conservative Senate candidate John James in Michigan: https://votevance2020.blogspot.com/2019/07/senate-conservatives-action-senate.html
|||||||||||||
“From the moment of conception until natural death, we must advocate for the right to life in this nation [Which is the FIRST right listed in the Declaration of Independence. Without the right to life, all other rights are irrelevant.], the last, best hope of mankind.”
Roe vs. Wade has NEVER been the law of the land. It has been and is government sanctioned murder. It is NOT and never has been law. For over 46 years we have been murdering our own children based upon lies and deceit.
For Life, for Liberty
Don L. Vance
“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment
No comments:
Post a Comment