1st post about Enterprise
and renting its cars:
2nd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
3rd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
4th post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
|||||||||||||
Video from Judicial Watch:
“Investigating the Investigators”
Judicial Watch is one conservative organization worth donating to and it is tax deductible as a charitable contribution if you file a Schedule A form.
“Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.”
“Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024”
|||||||||||||
Very early in the morning of November 20, 2018, I turned off my computer. Microsoft automatically downloaded a “critical update.” Two hours later when I tried to use the computer, I could not. I could not leave the startup page. I haven’t been on the computer since that morning. I am now using our local library’s computers and have not yet decided if I will try to have my computer repaired. However, it is time to start blogging again. Since I also can’t get into my old Microsoft accounts, I’m starting a new blog as of Saturday, May 4, 2019.
From my last post before being shut down:
“Even though I am being ‘shadow-banned,’ my pageview total hit an all time record high in October. Thank you.
According to google, October 18, 2018 was my 700th post on this website.
I’m still having major problems with microsoft. I finally ended up restoring it twice.”
|||||||||||||
Note: [ ] = my additions
|||||||||||||
My old pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2016/11/transsexual-fantasy-strikes-morton.html
“Transsexual Fantasy Strikes Morton, Illinois School District 709 and Four Board Members Capitulate to a Sexual Delusion.”
The new pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
“March for Our Lives, March for Life, Mainstream Media Hypocrisy, Leftist Hypocrisy, and Students as ‘Useful Idiots?’”
|||||||||||||
House of Representatives Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
These 24 Republicans voted to force taxpayers to pay for mutilating surgery for delusional transsexuals who are in the military. [I removed the names of the Representatives from all States who did not seek reelection since their primaries are over.]
Republicans voting No to defeat the amendment: [Original 24 now down to 8.]
[Conservative Review Conservative Scorecard grade]
No votes from Republicans by State:
1) Paul Cook [California-District 8 F 43% Won reelection.]
2) Jeffrey Denham [California-District 10 F 33% Lost.]
3) Steve Knight [California-District 25 F 31% Lost.]
1) Mike Coffman [Colorado-District 6 F 56% Lost.]
1) Carlos Curbelo [Florida-District 26 F 19% Lost.]
2) Brian Mast [Florida-District 18 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Justin Amash [Michigan-District 3 A 96% Won reelection. Has now left the Republican Party and is running in 2020 as an Independent candidate according to reports]
2) Jack Bergman [Michigan-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Leonard Lance [New Jersey-District 7 F 42% Lost.]
2) Tom MacArthur [New Jersey-District 3 F 25% Lost.]
1) John Faso [New York-District 19 F 50% Lost.]
2) John Katko [New York-District 24 F 25% Won reelection.]
3) Tom Reed [New York-District 23 F 43% Won reelection.]
4) Elise Stefanik [New York-21 F 19% Won reelection.]
5) Claudia Tenney [New York-District 22 F 38% Lost.]
1) Brian (Michael) Fitzpatrick [Pennsylvania-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Barbara Comstock [Virginia-District 10 F 19% Lost.]
These Republicans In Name Only by voting to affirm the delusional fantasies of transsexuals are helping to destroy the military and are, in my opinion, putting both delusional transsexuals and all other military personnel in danger on the battle field during combat. I will keep these names up at least through the 2020 primaries. Perhaps in 2020 more of these Representatives will be defeated in Republican primaries by actual Republican conservatives.
|||||||||||||
Update: Illinois Leftists “Wall of Shame.”
Original Article: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/08/transgendertranssexual-delusion.html
“Transgender/Transsexual Delusion, Legislative Fraud, and a RINO Governor Who Signed into Law His Reelection Defeat”
1) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
1a) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner: The last week of September, 2017 Governor Rauner also signed into law a bill requiring Illinois taxpayers to pay for the murder of babies within the womb for Illinois Medicaid recipients and State of Illinois employees. Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
Update: Because of the terrible choice for Governor at the top of the ticket, Illinois lost two more Republican members in the House of Representatives.
2) 64 members of the Illinois State House of Representatives [Listed at the end of the original article]
3) 32 members of the Illinois State Senate [Listed at the end of the original article]
|||||||||||||
Update: The Illinois House of Representatives overrode the Governor’s veto increasing the individual State income tax rate by 32%.
https://illinoisfamily.org/politics/unsustainable-raising-taxes-solves-nothing-makes-illinois-worse-off/
“The Illinois State House was back in session this afternoon to override Governor Bruce Rauner’s veto of a 32 percent permanent tax hike on Illinois families (SB 9). This tax grab also raises the corporate income tax rate by 33 percent. As anticipated, the House voted to override the veto this afternoon by a vote of 71-42 [71 being the minimum number of votes to override.]—with 61 Democrats and 10 Republicans voting in favor of increasing our taxes [By raising the tax rate by 32%. Plus, no doubt, increasing the cost of goods and/or increasing unemployment by raising corporate income tax rates by 33 1/3rd percent.].
To see how your state representative voted, please click HERE. To see how your state senator voted, please click HERE.
Much has been written for many years now about how Illinois is being mismanaged. The votes to override common sense is only the latest chapter in that mismanagement.”
Illinois Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
From: David E. Smith of Illinois Family Action [Updated with the 2018 election results]
July 7, 2017
“The Republicans who voted for the tax grab and who were reelected in 2018:
02) Terri Bryant (Carbondale) Won. [115th District]
04) Norine Hammond (Macomb) Won. [93rd District]
10) Mike Unes (East Peoria) Won. [61st District]”
Do you think the decision to vote to override the veto for a deficit budget that raised the income tax by 32% was popular in these districts? Seven of the 10 did not run for reelection.
|||||||||||||
Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. The “Four Pretenders” are:
Shaun Bill elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Clint Heinold elected term ended in
2017. He is off the school board.
Kelly Scarfe elected term ended in 2017.
She is off the school board.
Michelle Bernier elected term ended in
2019. She did not run for reelection. She is off the school board.
Board decisions have consequences. Elections have consequences.
|||||||||||||
Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 46 years ago as of January 22, 2019
46 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. EVIL personified!
Eight months after the 46th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, 747,945 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the AMERICAN HOLOCAUST continues day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Congress can not even defund Planned Murderhood. Establishment Republicans continually CAPITULATE to the Leftist socialist MURDERERS.
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the
Nation
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
|||||||||||||
I created a “Wall of Shame” a few years ago for really horrendous Legislative votes and Governor’s actions. It is time for a “Hall of Honor” for actions above and beyond the call of duty. The first such “Hall of Honor” goes to the Mayor and Trustees of the Village of Morton, Illinois who prohibited marijuana businesses within the village limits the same day that the law went into force. The mayor proposed the ordinance and the Trustees passed the ordinance 6-0. The “Hall of Honor” not includes the El Paso Mayor and Council and 6 members of the Naperville City Council.
“Hall of Honor”
Morton
Mayor (President) Jeff Kaufman
Trustee Rod Blunier
Trustee Steve Leitch
Trustee
Clinton Leman
Trustee Brad
Menold
Trustee Ken
Newman
Trustee Nate
Parrott
El Paso
Mayor J.W. Price
City Council Member Will Moore
City Council Member Jennie Kearney
City Council Member Alex Brucker
City Council Member Mary Ellen Kilpatrick
City Council Member Ken Faulk
City Council Member Kevin Wheatley
Naperville
There was some questionable
information about this vote in the article that I used. Two members of the
Naperville City Council contacted me about it. I asked one of the two to send
me the actual motion as voted upon. I received it Saturday when the library was
closed. That motion stated:
“A motion in substitution [A motion replacing the previous motion. The previous motion was not voted upon and I am not providing it here.] was made by Councilman Coyne, seconded by Councilman Hinterlong, for Option 1: to pass the ordinance amending Title 3 of the Naperville Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 17 prohibiting adult use cannabis business establishments other than medical cannabis cultivation centers and medical cannabis dispensing organizations and to direct staff to bring back a report within 60 days that advises Council concerning including an advisory (non-binding) referendum question on a future election ballot.”
Also from the council member who furnished the motion: “ … the three who voted against made it clear that they were only voting against because they wanted the motion to include more specific details regarding what specific [future election] ballot the referendum will be on:”
I apologize for the confusion. Newspaper articles generally don’t give the specific motion for a vote or the reasons why the members are voting for or against the specific motion.
These six
council members voted to prohibit ALL marijuana businesses within its
jurisdiction:
Council member Kevin Coyne ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Patricia Gustin ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Paul Hinterlong ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Patrick Kelly ~ current term expires in 2023
Council member John Krummen ~ current term expires in 2021
Council member Dr. Benjamin White ~ current term expires in 2021
These three
members of the council voted against the motion as presented:
Mayor Steve Chirico ~ current
term expires in 2023
Council member Theresa Sullivan
~ current term expires in 2023
Council member Judith Brodhead ~ current term expires in 2021
||||||||||||
1st post about murdering babies within the womb:
2nd post about murdering babies within the womb:
3rd post about murdering babies within the womb:
4th post about murdering babies within the womb:
5th post about murdering babies within the womb:
6th post about murdering babies within the womb:
7th post about murdering babies within the womb:
8th post about murdering babies within the womb:
9th post about murdering babies within the womb:
10th post about murdering babies within the womb:
11th post about murdering babies within the womb:
12th post about murdering babies within the womb:
13th post about murdering babies within the womb:
14th post about murdering babies within the womb:
15th post about murdering babies within the womb:
16th post about murdering babies within the womb:
17th post about murdering babies within the womb:
18th post about murdering babies within the womb:
19th post about murdering babies within the womb:
To save the life of the mother is a false premise. See:
“If a pregnant woman’s life is in danger, is abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] justified?”
|||||||||||||
New post:
Criminal law basically serves
two purposes: It defines certain behaviors as either right or wrong according
to the governing society. It also provides the necessary punishment for those
who violate those standards established by the governing society. In general,
the more severe the punishment(s) the more abhorrent the negative behavior is
considered to be.
We also know, from past experiences and human behavior, people will basically react to any law in one of four ways. Depending upon the behavior, the degree of each of these four ways will vary. However, in general, almost all people can be placed in one of the four ways in relation to a specific action.
1) Some people would never participate in a specific action regardless of the law because that action is morally reprehensible to them. For example: Murder. Even if murder were “legal” within the society, they would refuse to commit a murder.
2) Some people might, under the “correct” circumstances, participate in an action if legal but they will not participate in that same practice if illegal because of the societal declaration that it is unacceptable, because of the punishment imposed, or for both reasons. In this circumstance, light to no punishment might be inducement enough to participate in the action when a more severe punishment would greatly decrease participation.
3) Some people will be involved in an illegal action if they believe they have a chance to escape being caught and/or being punished for the illegal activity. In general, the less likely being caught and/or punished, the more likely they will participate in that illegal action [This is particularly important for minors if the activity is legal for adults but illegal for minors. Alcohol consumption and smoking cigarettes are two current examples. Use of “recreational” marijuana will be added to this list when “recreational” marijuana is officially legal on January 1, 2020. There is no question based upon past experience and human behavior that use will increase with availability, lack of enforcement, and peer pressure, among other factors.]
4) Some people are going to commit the crime regardless, if they decide it is in their best interest to commit the crime and they have no moral compunction not to commit the action. This is why no law will ever completely prevent that activity. Laws against murders don’t stop murders. Severe punishment doesn’t prevent all murders. No law ever stops an illegal act 100% of the time.
For legalizing “recreational” marijuana as well as changes in most laws, the individuals who fall into categories 2 and 3 are the ones who will generally be most affected by the change in the law.
Friday’s post conclusion:
If “recreational” marijuana
businesses are approved in a local jurisdiction, that jurisdiction will experience an increase
in the use and abuse of marijuana by minors. It occurs now with alcohol which is illegal for minors and it
will increase for marijuana although still illegal for minors. Legalizing
“recreational” marijuana tells minors that the State of Illinois and the local
jurisdiction see nothing wrong with using marijuana. Minors will have greater
access to marijuana just as they now have access to alcohol. This law will NOT protect minors. It will put minors at much
greater risk than they currently are. It is naïve to believe otherwise.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
definition of a “recreational” drug
“A drug (such as cocaine, marijuana, or methamphetamine) used without medical justification for its psychoactive effects often in the belief that occasional use of such a substance is not habit-forming or addictive
What is the definition of occasional use?
I was an elected official of a
school board in Arizona. Believe me when I say that good elected public officials
pay attention to these ACTIONS. If they don’t and they go against what you want
the solution is simple and democratic. VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE.
In Morton a few years ago, four of our seven school board members voted to implement a “transsexual” policy contrary to the wishes of the general voting public. The next election, three of the four were up for reelection. ALL three of them decided not to run for reelection. Our school superintendent who supported the four took another superintendent job as did the high school principal. I don’t know if the high school principal supported it but my guess is that it was a factor in her leaving. In the next election for the fourth member, she also decided not to run for reelection.
Remember this: Decisions have
consequences and as the voting public you have a voice in those
consequences. You have the ultimate power
over elected officials’ decisions, if you use it.
Decatur /dəˈkeɪtər/ is
the largest city and the county seat of Macon County in the U.S.
state of Illinois, with a population of 76,122 as of the 2010
Census. The city was founded in 1829 and is situated along the Sangamon
River and Lake Decatur in Central Illinois. In 2017, the city’s
estimated population was 72,174
“The
city is home of private Millikin University and public Richland
Community College. Decatur has vast industrial and agricultural processing
production, including the North American headquarters of agricultural
conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland, international agribusiness Tate
& Lyle's largest corn-processing plant, and the designing and manufacturing
facilities for Caterpillar Inc.’s wheel-tractor scrapers, compactors,
large wheel loaders, mining class motor grader, off-highway trucks, and large
mining trucks.”
Decatur
is about 70 miles southeast of Morton.
“Decatur council votes
6-1 against cannabis dispensaries, delays decision on open consumption
Analisa
Trofimuk | October 1, 2019
DECATUR — After hearing from residents for more than two hours,
the Decatur City Council has voted against allowing recreational cannabis dispensaries in
the city.
Council members Chuck Kuhle, Lisa Gregory, Pat McDaniel, Rodney
Walker, Bill Faber, and Mayor Julie Moore Wolfe voted to ‘opt out’ of allowing
sales. Councilman David Horn voted to allow the dispensaries.
Later in the meeting, the council
voted 4-3 to opt out of allowing cannabis-related businesses, such as
cultivation and processing centers, in Decatur.
The third question on the council’s
agenda addressed restrictions that will be placed on open consumption and use
of cannabis. The council voted to table the measure for an upcoming meeting.
Several council members expressed
concerns about how allowing recreational sales could affect the community,
particularly young people, and said they had gotten feedback from residents who
did not want the city to allow the sales. A few members said they might be in
favor of reconsidering the decision later, after seeing what happens in other
communities.
‘What I heard unequivocally from law
enforcement was, ‘You will never get enough money to cover the problems
this will bring [Absolutely true.],’’ Moore Wolfe said, speaking
before the vote. ‘I went to health officials, ER [Emergency Room. By the way,
my ex-wife is an Emergency Room nurse. I believe she would agree with this from
her years of experience as an Emergency Room nurse.] doctors, those that work
with overdose patients every day, and they said, ‘Don’t do this.’’
She acknowledged that there are
others who want the sales to be legal [Of course there are.], but added: ‘This
is a tough position for us to be in, but it’s our job to make the best possible
decisions we can [Exactly. If the voter doesn’t like the decisions reached by
the Council, vote them out of office. If they like the decisions, keep them in
office. It is called Representative democracy.].’
Horn pointed out that while medical
dispensaries are allowed in Decatur under current law, one has not opened in
the city. He said allowing the recreational sales could help people who use
cannabis for pain relief and other problems [Joke. If pain is a problem, why
hasn’t anyone opened a medical dispensary?].
‘There is a problem in Decatur and
that is a lack of access to medical cannabis [Obviously not since such a
situation could be remedied at the present time if there was sufficient
demand.],’ Horn said. ‘One key solution is to have an adult-use cannabis
dispensary in Decatur. We have individuals who have medical needs that are not
being met now [Prove it.].’
State lawmakers this year made Illinois the 11th state to
allow recreational use of marijuana, starting January 1. The legislation allows
cities to decide whether to allow dispensaries and businesses within their boundaries.
Municipalities can ‘opt out’ of allowing sales and can set some restrictions on
where cannabis can be consumed.”
[Comments
from the audience have been omitted. To read this section, use the above link.]
“Opponents
of allowing dispensaries included some community leaders, including Macon
County Sheriff Tony Brown, Crossing Healthcare CEO [Chief Executive Officer]
Tanya Andricks and former Decatur City Councilwoman Dana Ray, who is also a
physician at Crossing.
Faber unsuccessfully attempted to
amend the ordinance to attach a referendum, effectively asking the question of
the public on the next election’s ballot. ‘My aim is to get the issue decided
by the community,’ he said [Isn’t this why the people elect members to the
Council? To make decisions. If the voters don’t like the decisions made, vote
them out of office.].
His
motion was supported by Walker and Horn, but was opposed by Kuhle, Gregory,
McDaniel and Moore Wolfe.
Faber
also attempted to table the vote and take it at a future time, but that motion
was opposed by Gregory, McDaniel, Kuhle and Moore Wolfe.
Kuhle
and Moore Wolfe, in explaining their decisions, both made mention of the $70
million drug treatment and social services campus being built north of
downtown near the Wabash Crossing neighborhood. The campus, which includes multiple
facilities devoted to rehabilitation for those addicted to opioids and other
drugs [Does it make sense to legalize another drug particularly a drug that is
a known gateway drug? Why compound the problem of drug addiction?], is being
funded by the private foundation of former Macon County Sheriff Howard Buffett.
‘This
is a family community, and it seems to be counterintuitive to me to be saying
to our kids and our families, ‘This is OK [Duh.],’ at the same time that we are
building and supporting a center to help people who are addicted to drugs [Exactly.],’
Moore Wolfe said.
Buffett,
who has given millions of dollars to Decatur-area law enforcement and social
service agencies, as well as the city of Decatur, has spoken publicly about his opposition to the legalization of
recreational marijuana [Smart man.].
Kuhle
compared the amount of money that could be brought to Decatur though taxes on
cannabis with an estimated $125 million donated by Buffett over the years, much
of it to efforts to help law enforcement and fight drug addiction.
‘I
personally can’t think of a more flat-out rejection of our former sheriff and
his foundation than to approve the sale of recreational marijuana without a
wait-and-see approach,’ he said, adding that he wanted to ‘watch and learn’
from communities that opt in [What he will learn is NOT to opt in. The social
costs far outweigh any perceived benefits].”
[Comments
from the audience have been omitted. To read this section, use the above link.]
Congratulations
to Decatur for prohibiting “recreational” marijuana businesses. Every local
government in Illinois should do this and Republican elected officials in
Congress and the Illinois General Assembly SHOULD BE leading the way.
There are only three things
that can occur once “recreational” marijuana is legalized. Its use will increase among
minors. Its use will decrease among minors. Its use will remain the same. Realistically, which of the three do you believe will be the case?
|||||||||||
Petitions:
Petition to American Medical Association to Stop Trying to Prevent Pro-Life Laws from Going into Effect
|||||||||||||
Contribute to super PAC for Black conservative Senate candidate John James in Michigan: https://votevance2020.blogspot.com/2019/07/senate-conservatives-action-senate.html
|||||||||||||
“From the moment of conception until natural death, we must advocate for the right to life in this nation [Which is the FIRST right listed in the Declaration of Independence. Without the right to life, all other rights are irrelevant.], the last, best hope of mankind.”
Roe vs. Wade has NEVER been the law of the land. It has been and is government sanctioned murder. It is NOT and never has been law. For over 46 years we have been murdering our own children based upon lies and deceit.
For Life, for Liberty
Don L. Vance
“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment
No comments:
Post a Comment