1st post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
2nd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
3rd post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
4th post about Enterprise and renting its cars:
|||||||||||||
Video from Judicial Watch:
“Investigating the Investigators”
Judicial Watch is one conservative organization worth donating to and it is tax deductible as a charitable contribution if you file a Schedule A form.
“Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.”
“Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024”
|||||||||||||
Very early in the morning of November 20, 2018, I turned off my computer. Microsoft automatically downloaded a “critical update.” Two hours later when I tried to use the computer, I could not. I could not leave the startup page. I haven’t been on the computer since that morning. I am now using our local library’s computers and have not yet decided if I will try to have my computer repaired. However, it is time to start blogging again. Since I also can’t get into my old Microsoft accounts, I’m starting a new blog as of Saturday, May 4, 2019.
From my last post before being shut down:
“Even though I am being ‘shadow-banned,’ my pageview total hit an all time record high in October. Thank you.
According to google, October 18, 2018 was my 700th post on this website.
I’m still having major problems with microsoft. I finally ended up restoring it twice.”
|||||||||||||
Note: [ ] = my additions
Monday: Between 11AM – noon.
Tuesday: Between 11AM – noon.
Wednesday: Between 11AM – noon.
Thursday: Between 11AM – noon.
Friday: Between 11AM - noon. [The library closes at 6PM.]
Saturday: Between 11AM - noon. [The library closes at 5PM.]
Sunday: The library is closed on Sunday.
|||||||||||||
My old pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2016/11/transsexual-fantasy-strikes-morton.html
“Transsexual Fantasy Strikes Morton, Illinois School District 709 and Four Board Members Capitulate to a Sexual Delusion.”
“Transsexual Fantasy Strikes Morton, Illinois School District 709 and Four Board Members Capitulate to a Sexual Delusion.”
The new pageview record for Vote Vance 2016:
“March for Our Lives, March for Life, Mainstream Media Hypocrisy, Leftist Hypocrisy, and Students as ‘Useful Idiots?’”
|||||||||||||
House of Representatives Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
These 24 Republicans voted to force taxpayers to pay for mutilating surgery for delusional transsexuals who are in the military. [I removed the names of the Representatives from all States who did not seek reelection since their primaries are over.]
Republicans voting No to defeat the amendment: [Original 24 now down to 8.]
[Conservative Review Conservative Scorecard grade]
No votes from Republicans by State:
1) Paul Cook [California-District 8 F 43% Won reelection.]
2) Jeffrey Denham [California-District 10 F 33% Lost.]
3) Steve Knight [California-District 25 F 31% Lost.]
1) Mike Coffman [Colorado-District 6 F 56% Lost.]
1) Carlos Curbelo [Florida-District 26 F 19% Lost.]
2) Brian Mast [Florida-District 18 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Justin Amash [Michigan-District 3 A 96% Won reelection.]
2) Jack Bergman [Michigan-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Leonard Lance [New Jersey-District 7 F 42% Lost.]
2) Tom MacArthur [New Jersey-District 3 F 25% Lost.]
1) John Faso [New York-District 19 F 50% Lost.]
2) John Katko [New York-District 24 F 25% Won reelection.]
3) Tom Reed [New York-District 23 F 43% Won reelection.]
4) Elise Stefanik [New York-21 F 19% Won reelection.]
5) Claudia Tenney [New York-District 22 F 38% Lost.]
1) Brian (Michael) Fitzpatrick [Pennsylvania-District 1 F 50% Won reelection.]
1) Barbara Comstock [Virginia-District 10 F 19% Lost.]
These Republicans In Name Only by voting to affirm the delusional fantasies of transsexuals are helping to destroy the military and are, in my opinion, putting both delusional transsexuals and all other military personnel in danger on the battle field during combat. I will keep these names up at least through the 2020 primaries. Perhaps in 2020 more of these Representatives will be defeated in Republican primaries by actual Republican conservatives.
|||||||||||||
Update: Illinois Leftists “Wall of Shame.”
Original Article: https://votevance2016.blogspot.com/2017/08/transgendertranssexual-delusion.html
“Transgender/Transsexual Delusion, Legislative Fraud, and a RINO Governor Who Signed into Law His Reelection Defeat”
1) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
1a) Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner: The last week of September, 2017 Governor Rauner also signed into law a bill requiring Illinois taxpayers to pay for the murder of babies within the womb for Illinois Medicaid recipients and State of Illinois employees. Lost = less than 40% of the vote.
Update: Because of the terrible choice for Governor at the top of the ticket, Illinois lost two more Republican members in the House of Representatives.
2) 64 members of the Illinois State House of Representatives [Listed at the end of the original article]
3) 32 members of the Illinois State Senate [Listed at the end of the original article]
|||||||||||||
Update: The Illinois House of Representatives overrode the Governor’s veto increasing the individual State income tax rate by 32%.
https://illinoisfamily.org/politics/unsustainable-raising-taxes-solves-nothing-makes-illinois-worse-off/
“The Illinois State House was back in session this afternoon to override Governor Bruce Rauner’s veto of a 32 percent permanent tax hike on Illinois families (SB 9). This tax grab also raises the corporate income tax rate by 33 percent. As anticipated, the House voted to override the veto this afternoon by a vote of 71-42 [71 being the minimum number of votes to override.]—with 61 Democrats and 10 Republicans voting in favor of increasing our taxes [By raising the tax rate by 32%. Plus, no doubt, increasing the cost of goods and/or increasing unemployment by raising corporate income tax rates by 33 1/3rd percent.].
To see how your state representative voted, please click HERE. To see how your state senator voted, please click HERE.
Much has been written for many years now about how Illinois is being mismanaged. The votes to override common sense is only the latest chapter in that mismanagement.”
Illinois Republicans “Wall of Shame.”
From: David E. Smith of Illinois Family Action [Updated with the 2018 election results]
July 7, 2017
“The Republicans who voted for the tax grab and who were reelected in 2018:
02) Terri Bryant (Carbondale) Won. [115th District]
04) Norine Hammond (Macomb) Won. [93rd District]
10) Mike Unes (East Peoria) Won. [61st District]”
Do you think the decision to vote to override the veto for a deficit budget that raised the income tax by 32% was popular in these districts? Seven of the 10 did not run for reelection.
|||||||||||||
Four of the seven Morton, Illinois District 709 School Board members voted to support transsexual sexual delusions. The “Four Pretenders” are:
Shaun Bill elected term ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Clint Heinold elected term
ended in 2017. He is off the school board.
Kelly Scarfe elected term
ended in 2017. She is off the school board.
Michelle Bernier elected
term ended in 2019. She did not run for reelection. She is off the school
board.
Board decisions have consequences. Elections have consequences.
|||||||||||||
Roe vs. Wade decided January 22, 1973 = 46 years ago as of January 22, 2019
46 years of government sanctioned murder of our own children. EVIL personified!
Five months after the 46th year of the illegal, unconstitutional Roe vs. Wade decision, 413,699 babies within the womb have been murdered because of federal government sanctioned evil based upon one million murders of babies within the womb per year. And the AMERICAN HOLOCAUST continues day after day. What has Congress done to stop the unconstitutional murder of our own children? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Congress can not even defund Planned Murderhood. Establishment Republicans continually CAPITULATE to the Leftist socialist MURDERERS.
Restore the Constitution
Take Back the Nation
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
I am a Christian, Constitutionalist, conservative
|||||||||||||
1st post about murdering babies within the womb:
2nd post about murdering babies within the womb:
3rd post about murdering babies within the womb:
4th post about murdering babies within the womb:
5th post about murdering babies within the womb:
6th post about murdering babies within the womb:
7th post about murdering babies within the womb:
8th post about murdering babies within the womb:
9th post about murdering babies within the womb:
10th post about murdering babies within the womb:
11th post about murdering babies within the womb:
12th post about murdering babies within the womb:
13th post about murdering babies within the womb:
14th post about murdering babies within the womb:
15th post about murdering babies within the womb:
16th post about murdering babies within the womb:
17th post about murdering babies within the womb:
18th post about murdering babies within the womb:
19th post about murdering babies within the womb:
To save the life of the mother is a false premise. See:
“If a pregnant woman’s life is in danger, is abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] justified?”
|||||||||||||
New post:
“New York Times
Needs an Education on the True History of Abortion [The murder of babies within
the womb.] Laws
Gualberto Garcia
Jones, Esq. | June 28, 2019
June 28, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — On June 23, 2019, the New York Times published
a guest editorial by John Irving, the Oscar winning screenwriter of the Cider
House Rules, in which he proclaimed that ‘abortion [The murder of babies within
the womb.] opponents don’t care what happens to an
unwanted child, and they’ve never cared about the mother [Leftist socialists
lie continually. Do they “care” about the mother? Their policy of supporting
and promoting the murder of babies within the womb have turned millions of
mothers into murderers, murdered millions of female babies, and resulted in the
loss of over 62 million residents/citizens of the United States plus the
children those 62 million people would have had if they had actually lived to
adulthood. Just who cares about life and women?].’
During the month when America
is being carpet-bombed with propaganda pushing inclusion and tolerance
[homosexual “pride” month.], Mr. Irving proves what social conservatives have
known from the beginning: the tolerance of the godless Left is very often a
one-way street [Not often. Almost always.]. ‘All are welcome,’ proclaim the
rainbow-colored banners, unless, of course, you happen to believe that children
in the womb deserve fundamental human rights [Almost all homosexual radicals
support and promote the murder of babies within the womb although as
homosexuals they are incapable of producing offspring in a homosexual relationship
with someone of the same sex that they are.].
Condescension or guilt?
Mr. Irving’s essay is
dripping with the condescension of a person who believes he is superior to
those with whom he disagrees [Almost always the case with Leftist socialists.]. It
is reminiscent of Obama’s famous quote describing those who challenged his policy
views as bitter people who ‘cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people
who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant [We are NOT anti-immigrant. My
grandparents on my mother’s side were immigrants from Germany. I never heard
her speak English although I was told she could. She just didn’t like to speak
English. However, we ARE anti-illegal aliens. There is a fundamental difference which Leftist
socialists refuse to recognize.] sentiment
or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.’ His essay also
expresses similar sentiments to Hillary Clinton’s famous description of Donald
Trump’s supporters as a ‘basket of deplorables [Deplored by whom? Leftist
socialists.].’ So much for inclusion and tolerance.
One has to wonder whether Mr.
Irving’s pro-abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] tirade isn’t just his way of ‘explaining his
frustrations,’ or perhaps, instead, a result of his guilty conscience from something
in his own past. Of course, no one is immune from making bad choices, but it is
how one reacts to those bad choices that demonstrates his maturity as a
person.
I was once oblivious to the
plight of the child in the womb. As a teenager caught up in what I thought
was an unplanned pregnancy, I once said the words, ‘I’ll support you in whatever
choice you decide to make [The ignorance of youth. I Corinthians 13: 11 “When I was a child, I talked
like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.].’
I thought I was being a real
man, when, in fact, I was putting all of the responsibility of a reckless
lifestyle on my girlfriend. Thankfully, I didn’t become the father of a
dead child. But I could have, and maybe if I had, the weight of that
choice on my conscience would have left me bitter and resentful toward those
who proclaim the painful truth that abortion is murder [Indeed, it is.].
I don’t wish to make the same
mistake as Mr. Irving by condemning and demonizing him as a hopeless proponent
of child murder. Instead, I would like him to know that no one is beyond
redemption and that the greatest sinners have often become the greatest saints
[True. The Apostle Paul proclaimed himself the worst of sinners because he
supported and promoted the murder of Christians. Yet, he became one of the best
known Christians in history and the author of numerous books within the New
Testament of the Bible.].
I would, however, like to set
the historical record straight, because while personal experience and emotions
matter to all of us as human beings, facts exist apart from ideology [True
although Leftist socialists tend to ignore facts and the truth.], and truth and
history are objective things that exist apart from our feelings.
Setting the record straight: A matter of policy
preference
Mr. Irving asserts that
pro-lifers don’t care about unwanted children and rhetorically asks: ‘Aren’t
the same people who sacralize the fetus [baby] generally opposed to any
meaningful welfare for unwanted children and unmarried mothers [The correct
answer is no.]?’ The answer is no, of course. Generally, people who
recognize the pre-born child as a person are the same ones who lead adoption
agencies for children and crisis pregnancy centers for unwed mothers. They fund
private school grants for low-income children and immigrants, and they advocate
policies across the board that provide meaningful ways to improve the welfare
of children [What we don’t support is people becoming “wards” of the State. A
form of “slavery” just was devastating as the slavery that occurred within the
United States. Instead of being dependent upon the plantation owner, the modern
“slave” is dependent upon the government whether it is the federal government,
a State government, or a combination of both.].
When Mr. Irving refers to
‘meaningful welfare,’ he means government-funded, socialized welfare and health
care [Exactly.]. Unfortunately, Mr. Irving making the same error as Obama
and Clinton, which is to demonize those who disagree on a particular policy
preference [Socialism is the government ownership of the means of
production. One of the means of production is labor. That means the government owns your labor, my labor, everyone’s labor. That is NOT freedom. That is slavery.].
I genuinely believe, and I am
happy to back up my belief with solid evidence, that free-market capitalism
built upon a solid moral foundation provides the greatest meaningful welfare
for the greatest number of people [Absolutely.], especially for those who would
benefit the most from merit-based upward mobility [Personal responsibility and
personal accountability.]. However, I also know that the majority of those
who believe in socialized government welfare have a genuine concern for the
welfare of the vulnerable and disadvantaged [I don’t believe that to be true.
They are concerned with gaining and maintaining power for themselves and others
that they consider to be the elite of the society.]. My policy preference
does not prejudice me against those people. Instead, I hope that, from a
position of respect for the other person’s motives, I can convince him of the
strength of my beliefs.
Unfortunately, respectful
disagreements are rare, especially when it comes to abortion [The murder of
babies within the womb.]. The fact that the N.Y. Times published
such a vitriolic, prejudiced (and, frankly, bigoted) opinion-editorial is
evidence of how far we have fallen as a society [Indeed we have and the
greatest evidence of that is the fact that the murder of babies within the womb
is considered sacrosanct by Leftist socialists.].
Setting the record straight: The history
The second objective point
that needs correction in Mr. Irving’s essay concerns the historical evolution
of abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] laws in America. Mr.
Irving states that the reason behind the advancement of America’s 19th-century
anti-abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] laws is, at best, unknown
[He lies.]:
“Doctors were establishing their new profession; midwives
and homeopaths were their competition. But why did doctors lobby for abortion
[The murder of babies within the womb.] to be illegal [Because they knew it was
murder.]? What was their logic? Did doctors underestimate how great
the need [Need? Seriously?] for abortion [The murder of babies within
the womb.] was? We know what the doctors wanted, and they achieved it; they
became the arbiters of women’s reproductive health care [Murdering a baby
within the womb is not health care. This is the typical Leftist socialist’s
misuse of words to achieve a prospective contrary to the truth.]. We don’t know
the doctors’ reasons for making abortion [The murder of babies within the
womb.] illegal [Being opposed to murder?]. In the 1840s, the fetus [baby]
wasn’t yet sacred. Fetal [baby] life was still defined by ‘quickening’ — when
the woman felt the fetus [baby] move, not before the fourth or fifth month
[Liar.]. From the 1840s to 1900, we know the results of what the doctors did —
not their thoughts.’
In fact, we know precisely what doctors were thinking and why they, and not priests and pastors, were the ones
who led the crusade to criminalize abortion
[The murder of babies within the womb.] in America. Mr. Irving, and anyone
interested in this history, should read Frederick Dyer’s excellent book, The
Physician’s Crusade Against Abortion [The murder of babies within the
womb.], which details the life and work of Dr. Horatio Storer, the
Harvard-trained physician [Now Harvard, as do many universities, supports and
promotes the murder of babies within the womb.] who led the American Medical
Association’s opposition to abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.].
Dr. Storer was not just a 19th-century pro-life doctor.
He was one of the fathers of the modern practice of gynecology. He developed
and performed some of the most revolutionary procedures of the time and
published extensively on the topic of prenatal and maternal health in the most
prestigious contemporary scientific journals. His ‘reason for making abortion
[The murder of babies within the womb.] illegal’ is crystal-clear for anyone
wishing to do a minimal amount of research. Dr. Storer, who was not Catholic,
was guided not by papal encyclicals (which Mr. Irving quotes extensively with
an obvious anti-Catholic bigotry), but by the perfectly reasonable medical
ethic of protecting and healing human beings [Exactly. The baby, from
conception on, is a living human being developing within the womb as intended
by GOD.]. To Dr. Storer, the American Medical Association, and a majority of
physicians at the time, it was clear that a pregnant mother presented them a
case with two patients [The mother AND the child within the womb.], and that
both deserved care [Of course.], and that neither should ever be killed
[murdered] intentionally.
As his own published scientific studies and those of
other medical pioneers of the time showed, the child in the womb was recognized
as being alive from the moment of conception [Absolutely true. We have known, at
least, by this time that life begins at conception. Of course, GOD has ALWAYS
known this.]. Again, this was not a religious belief, but a scientific reality
[True.]. In the mid-1800s, medical science was advancing at a pace that would
be matched only by the advent of modern genetics. As a result of these
advances, Dr. Storer and his fellow physicians at the American Medical
Association concluded that the old medical standard of ‘quickening,’ which
marked the beginning of life from the moment when the mother could feel the
child move, was unscientific and obsolete [Correct.]. In fact, it was also
dangerous for both mother and child, as the lack of criminal penalties and
regulation left open the door for unscrupulous quack doctors and midwives who
profited in a manner not unlike Dr. Kermit Gosnell [Murdering the baby within
the womb for profit.].
Thanks to Dr. Storer’s successful advocacy, the child in
the womb would be protected by law until the sexual revolution created the
demand to legalize abortion [The murder of babies within the womb. Abortion has
NEVER been legal at the federal level. The courts can not constitutionally make
law. The murders have been federal government sanctioned. The murders have not
been legalized at the federal level.] as a way to sanction sex without
consequences [Without major consequences for the man. There are consequences
for the mother and for the baby.]. This move to decriminalize abortion [The
murder of babies within the womb.] would see its climax in the [very]
unconstitutional decision of Roe v. Wade, which ignored basic
human biology and legal precedent and dehumanized the child in the womb
[Exactly what it did. The judges also ignored and misused the 5th and 14th
Amendments.].
Abolitionist history
America has had to grapple
with the dehumanization of an entire class of human beings before. The clearest
example was the institution of American slavery, which claimed the lives of
countless slaves and hundreds of thousands of soldiers in the Civil War [By
far, the most lives lost in any war or conflict the USA has been involved in.
However, many more Americans have been murdered by abortion, by far, than all
those killed by war and conflict.].
Interestingly, during the
same time that Dr. Storer was advocating for the protection of prenatal
children in the various states’ criminal codes, the United States was
responding to racial bigotry with the promise of equal protection in the 14th Amendment.
It is an accepted historical fact that while many of the slavery abolitionists
were Northern Christians, their motivation to oppose the institution of slavery
was not a desire to impose their theology on the South. Likewise, while it is
true that physicians like Dr. Storer were Christians who felt a moral
obligation to combat the grave injustice of abortion [The murder of babies
within the womb.], their motivation was not to impose a theological belief upon
others, but rather, like the slavery abolitionists, to combat injustice [Murder
is by definition an injustice.].
Mr. Irving’s thesis that the
timeline of abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] opposition can be
boiled down to a ‘long cruel history’ of misogynistic religious zealotry is a
figment of his own anti-Christian imagination [It is a lie.]. In fact, it is
fair to say that if the criminal abortion [The murder of babies within the
womb.] laws that were passed as a result of Dr. Storer’s campaigns are to be
considered a violation of the 1st Amendment, then the 14th Amendment would also
have to be considered unconstitutional for the same reasons.
An entirely different movie
In 2012, I wrote and produced
a short film titled Emancipation that explores the interplay
between slavery and abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.]. You can watch it here. It
is set in a Western town in the 1850s, before Colorado became a state and when
tensions over slavery were at their peak. In my film, the life of a runaway
slave crosses paths with the life of a prostitute when they fall in love and
conceive a child. As was commonly the case with prostitutes in the West,
the female protagonist had been lured and trafficked into the life of a saloon
prostitute and was kept there as a sex slave. The antagonist is the local
saloon owner, who is also the town veterinarian and quack abortionist [Murderer
of babies within the womb.]. I don’t wish to spoil the film, so suffice it to
say that in Emancipation, the protagonists are set free from
bondage through a life-affirming twist that resembles the true stories of
countless women who overcome difficult circumstances surrounding their
pregnancies to become heroic mothers.
Like the film Cider
House Rules, which earned Mr. Irving his Oscar [I’ve never seen it.], his
glorification of renegade abortionists [Murderers of babies within the womb.]
is pure fiction [And probably pure propaganda. Can’t say for sure because I
have not seen it.]. The reality is that even Mr. Irving’s hero, Planned
Parenthood [Planned Murderhood] founder Margaret Sanger, initially advocated
for contraception as a way to avoid the crime of abortion [The murder of babies
within the womb.] precisely because she recognized that a child was being
killed [murdered] and a pregnant mother’s life was being endangered.
The clear anti-religious
animus displayed by Mr. Irving’s editorial is a sign of the times. It has led
him to an erroneous historical conclusion and an equally erroneous
characterization of pro-lifers as misogynistic ‘zealots.’ I am convinced that
in time, his essay will be read as an example of the gravest moral failing
[sin] of our era.
Gualberto Garcia Jones,
Esq. is the president of the Personhood
Alliance and a
licensed attorney in the commonwealth of Virginia. He is a human rights adviser
to the Holy See Mission to the Organization of American States and works in
Washington, D.C. to stop the expansion of abortion [The murder of babies within the womb.] in Latin
America.
|||||||||||||
Petitions:
|||||||||||||
|||||||||||||
“From the moment of conception until natural death, we must advocate for the right to life in this nation [Which is the FIRST right listed in the Declaration of Independence. Without the right to life, all other rights are irrelevant.], the last, best hope of mankind.”
Roe vs. Wade has NEVER been the law of the land. It has been and is government sanctioned murder. It is NOT and never has been law. For over 46 years we have been murdering our own children based upon lies and deceit.
For Life, for Liberty
Don L. Vance
“With a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment
No comments:
Post a Comment